 |

< Back
State Infrastructure Fund To Cut Out PPP Middle Man
November 10th 2005
NSW Democrats MLC, Dr Arthur Chesterfield-Evans has called for the implementation
of a State Infrastructure Fund to provide a less expensive, and more accountable
way of building much needed infrastructure.
"After the Cross-City Tunnel unfolds in it's entirety, there is going
to be no support for Private Public Partnerships. In virtually every case
in the last ten years we have seen some kind of deal that let's the private
sector profit hugely at the public's expense - its time to come up with
something better," said Dr. Chesterfield-Evans.
The proposal for a State Infrastructure Fund would allow the state government
to take back the control of large projects and bring down costs through
the significantly lower interest rate that is available to government.
"The NSW Government has a triple-A credit rating, and we should be
using it to the advantage of the NSW public. The current regime of Public
Private Partnerships just puts money in the pockets of the private sector
managers who serve as a middle man between the government and the investors,
and the costs for these private sector borrowers just adds to the cost
of the project," he said.
Dr. Chesterfield-Evans views today's call by Macquarie Bank for more PPP
projects involving superannuation investment groups as a serious reason
for the government to manage the financing through a state based infrastructure
bond system.
"The fact, that superannuation funds are said to be very interested
in the stability and high yield of such projects, makes it very clear
that we should not be handing these opportunities over to the private
sector for further profit making." he said.
Dr. Chesterfield-Evans points to the overwhelming evidence emerging from
the Cross City Tunnel, the Lane Cove Tunnel and the M7, as well as the
continuing issue of the Airport Line, as evidence that the current level
of concessions being made to sweeten these deals is proving too high a
cost in terms of long-term planning.
"A much subtler effect of the government handing responsibility for
infrastructure over to the private sector is that the planning authorities
have atrophied and lost a lot of staff. This puts the government in a
poor position to negotiate for the public good. They just don't have the
expertise anymore and this needs to be addressed immediately," he
concluded.
.
|
|
updated:
December 1, 2005
|
 |