Submission to Senate Inquiry into Adequacy of Newstart 30/9/19
I am a
medical doctor and retired NSW MLC with some practical experience of the
welfare systems and some knowledge of economics. Currently I am working with
injured people who receive (or do not receive) Workers Compensation or CTP
insurance benefits and who transfer to or are rejected by Centrelink for the
DSP or Newstart.
This summary merely list points made in the submission. It does not follow the terms of reference as
the main submission does.
Right It is necessary that people on welfare have an acceptable standard of
living as a human right. Discussion of the level of welfare should start from
what standard needs to be reached and then how to pay for it, not from a
financial point of view- how far will this money go?
equity is needed to maintain social harmony, and long-term disadvantage
without real prospects of disadvantaged people getting jobs is likely to lead
to a breakdown of social order in the medium term.
affordable housing is an absolute necessity for a reasonable quality of
life. The rise in housing prices largely
due to the tax advantages of negative gearing have led to property being seen
as a commodity and driven a huge rise in property prices. This has led to rent
rises higher than inflation and a churn in tenants to allow these rent
rises. Thus has made rental
accommodation in Australia less stable than in many countries, and especially
affects lower income people.
unemployment exists due to technological change with globalisation and the
increased mobility of capital and goods creating a world market in which developed
countries are not price-competitive in labour.
This has been exacerbated by automation and the ‘offshoring’ of
Creation The Government needs to acknowledge that there are not enough jobs
for those who seek them and to take responsibility for the problem. They must
create jobs, rather than just blame the victim, appeal to the private sector or
give tax breaks to the top end of town.
Education Treating education as a commodity and favouring university
education over trades has created an inappropriately trained population with an
oversupply of graduates and bad skill shortages in skilled trades.
for some in education leads to residualisation of others as children of
aspiring parents leave schools in poorer areas to go by subsidised transport to
schools out of their area, private or public.
The residualisation tends to concentrate disadvantaged children
worsening social equity and making it harder for children in those schools to
have equality of opportunity. This makes
unemployment more likely in these children in these locations.
Labour The import of foreign unskilled as well as skilled labour undermines
Australian jobs as the government tacitly tolerates and encourages sub-award
pay and conditions by attacking unions and under resourcing the Fair Work inspectorate.
private welfare system such as Workers Compensation and Third Party Motor
Vehicle Accident insurance schemes are run far less ethically than the Banks
were shown to be run by the Hayne Royal Commission. They are extremely poorly supervised by their
regulatory agencies such as SIRA in NSW.
They routinely deny benefits and treatment to people who should be
entitled to them. This has been helped
by State legislation that shortens benefit duration, reduces oversight of
insurers in practice and attempts to transfer the costs from State-based
insurers to Federal agencies such as Centrelink and Medicare, both of which are
resisting with either denials of DSP and Newstart, or derisory Medicare
rebates, which means that doctors will not use them and patients do not get
treated. Naturally these people do not
get treatment, do not recover, cannot work and join the long-term unemployed.
Centrelink! The author recommends
that all members of the Committee of Inquiry try to contact Centrelink by
phone, attend an office and interview some random, unselected Centrelink
clients to understand the full impact of the callous approach that Centrelink
has to its clients and the effect on them.
psychology The destructive effect of
an inability to participate in society is very debilitating. Welfare recipients
couch-surf for accommodation, have trouble t]printing job application, cannot
afford to get to interviews, have insufficient money for phone credits to call
Centrelink and cannot afford to join their friends for coffee of a movie.
Prevention It is surprising that there is not more street crime given the
ghettoisation and long-term nature of unemployment. This type of crime is likely to increase if
the situation is not addressed. Welfare can be thought as part of a crime
Stimulus The fact that pooper people
spend a greater percentage of their income locally (and save less) means that
money spent on welfare is likely to have a much better fiscal stimulating
effect on the economy than either tax cuts or infrastructure spending, as the
tax cuts go to wealthier people who save more or to corporate profits, which in
terms of fiscal stimulus should be counted initially as an overhead.
Effects If money available for rent
increases with no increase in housing stock, it is possible that rent will
increase. But the answer to this is to
increase affordable housing stock, not to be niggardly with welfare.
are a Distraction The idea of
housing, education or health as ‘alternatives’ to a welfare increase is a
slightly absurd distraction. Housing is necessary for shelter, the ability to
organise a life and for a sense of belonging to society. Education is the only
hope for children to have a future and for equality of opportunity, and
universal health insurance is a human right. Spending on these three is likely
to most-cost effective when it is spent on those who have least of them, but it
will not replace an adequate discretionary income.
Delivery to Schools The direct
delivery of food or health programmes through school is likely to allow
targeted help to the most vulnerable children.
School nurses are very cost effective, and are used in NZ. Needs-based
funding on the original Gonski model is likely to help both disadvantaged
schools and Australia’s falling education rating.
health insurance is needed as a public good, and is by far the most
efficient type of health care in terms of overheads. It particularly affects poorer people.
Medicare has been starved and the rebate to doctors has gone from 85% of the
AMA fee to 46%. Most specialists will not work for it so poor people simply cannot
afford care. They go to Emergency Depts.
as late presentations instead of to GPs, adding to both State health costs and
of Payments needed by Newstart
depends on the cost and quality of other services such as housing, education,
health care and transport. Subsidising
these has immense benefits to all in reducing overheads, but especially to
poorer people and welfare dependent ones. Subsidising public transport saves in
terms of road costs, parking and pollution costs as well as giving access to
jobs and recreation for poorer people who live further from town. At present public services are being wound
down for ideological reasons that are not justified on the evidence.
Payment Levels should be done by an independent body and on an
evidence-based model, to stop it being the victim of ideological theories and
political whims. The huge delay causing the current crisis is evidence that
having welfare as a political football is a bad idea. Major decisions such as
Interest rates and wages are set by independent bodies, the Reserve Bank and
the Arbitration Commission. Governments accept their decisions and manage their
affairs within that constraint and they should do so for a welfare system that
allows all Australians to share a common destiny in good times and bad.
appended show the disparity between house prices and income and effect of
house prices on national private debt.
This submission addresses the Terms of Reference in order.
It is written from practical experience, economic knowledge and with some
research. Areas in which the author does not have expertise are not mentioned.
This does not mean that they are unimportant.
Comments on policy are made in relation to the term of reference, even
if they are not directly asked in that term.
An Acceptable Standard of Living including
Two of the Four Freedoms in the UN Declaration of Human
Rights are Freedom from Want and Freedom from Fear. It is necessary that in Australia with a
relatively high national income that people have enough money for food, shelter
and some money to associate with others and enjoy some quality of life. The amount of money needed for this last
depends to a considerable extent on how much society’s resources are free, such
as parks and health care and how much necessities cost such as transport. This to some extent depends on the extent to
which monopoly products, such as roads have been privatised.
The most critical item is usually accommodation. The
widespread use of negatively geared real estate as an easy route to riches for
those who have surplus income has led to property being seen as an asset class
that cannot lose money. This is almost a national Ponzi scheme where everyone
buys on the assumption that prices will continue to rise. This has been self-fulfilling[i],
but the national private debt has grown enormously[ii],
while politicians and economists have been concentrating on public debt. The bottom line of this is that property has
risen hugely in value, and in 2016 the median Sydney house price was 14 times
the median income, but
most of this value is in mortgage debt, which our banks have borrowed from
foreign banks. So those who have cashed
out their capital gains have done so at the expense of those who bought, and as
a nation, Australia still carries the debt, requires large interest repayments,
creates a national vulnerability to a fall in our dollar and limits Australia’s
ability to invest in more productive assets or industries. The national obsession with real estate has
been worst in Australia than other countries, and this must surely relate to
the negative-gearing tax legislation.
At a practical level, rents have risen as property prices rise
and this has been worst in Sydney. People
on fixed incomes simply cannot afford shelter, and this is compounded by the
almost complete cessation of the building of public housing, which has resulted
in housing stock being taken by those on welfare or with age and disability,
creating a subculture of welfare dependency with few role models.
It is therefore an oversimplification to see the problems as
just one of income. But to address the
problem requires pro-active policies in social structures and resources as well
as infrastructure and education.
Given that many landlords see their properties as an
investment, they are naturally keen to maximise returns. As prices rise the
rental returns fall as a percentage of capital invested, even if that capital
was not invested by the landlord, but is created by the overall market price
rise. Since house prices are rising much
faster than inflation, there is therefore pressure on rents to rise faster than
inflation and faster than wages.
Unsurprisingly, landlords and agents often encounter resistance from tenants
when they try to get rent rises greater than inflation. It is therefore easier
simply to terminate the tenancy and start again with ‘market rent’. This leads
to tenants being forced to move every year or so, and always having to take the
rent rises. This has meant that rents
have been an ever-increasing share of incomes particularly in Sydney. The
dislocation associated with forced moving is an ever-present reminder of the
power structures in society and a significant demoralising factor for a
considerable segment of the population.
The changes in tax so that housing investment was seen as
more long-term might begin to addresses these problems, but it requires some
political courage as the idea of negative gearing is embedded in the
society. Property investors are aware
that they are getting rich by borrowing but less aware that the selling to get
rich relies on someone else’s borrowing and cannot be sustained at a national
the labour market, unemployment
and under-employment in Australia, including the structural causes of long term
unemployment and long term reliance on Newstart;
Governments in Australia need to face the fact that there
are not enough jobs for the Australians who need them and that the price structure
is moving in a direction that is worsening the situation. There are a number of
reasons for this:
The use of automation to replace labour,
resulting in the closure of many offices and factories
The mobility of information, capital and goods
that has allowed competition from cheap
labour countries to replace Australian industries with a big competitive
advantage in cost structures, so that more goods are imported.
The weakening of unions and the rise of labour
hire companies that has allowed for increasing sub award wages, cash payments
and a reduction of job security.
The use of work visas for unskilled labour,
creating a sub-class of workers in the agricultural, cleaning services, hospitality
and semi-skilled building industry where low wages are paid and Australian
residents do not even compete for jobs.
It begs credibility that the Government is unaware of what
is happening as they increase the number of unskilled workers to come to
Australia on temporary visas, leave the unions emasculated and the Fair Work
Tribunal under-resourced for any sort of policing role. The large number of foreign students who are
in Australia as paying University fees who also need work and are a significant
pool working illegally, again for cash or sub-award wages. Naturally they are
in no position to complain, so act to lower real paid wages, even if they have
no direct effect on statutory rewards. Australian
government must face the reality that Australia’s cost and price structures are
such that employers cannot compete on price in many cases and have therefore
become importers. Structurally there
will a continuing and probably worsening problem that many Australians will be
unable to get jobs, and there needs to be a national strategy to create
industries that are world competitive in a balance of payments sense and which
will create lasting employment. Failing that Australia could take a Middle
Eastern or Norwegian solution that charges far more royalties to companies
exporting our commodity resources and invests these in long term assets to
support our economy. The development of renewable energy has been suggested as
an export industry to develop, but it appears that the influence of the coal
lobby is undermining innovation in this area.
Those who chronically cannot find work remain on Newstart and the demeaning
effect of continually applying for jobs that do not exist must demoralise even
the most resourceful person. The ghettoisation of poverty as outlined above compounds
this, and it is surprising that there has been so little backlash from
employers getting thousands of job application that they have no possible
positons for. Presumably such correspondence is easy to ignore and dispose of.
The policy that allows ‘choice’ in schools and subsidises
bus fares for children of more upwardly mobile families to attend either
private schools or schools in better locations also leads to a residualisation
effect where those who have less choice are all together and social
disadvantage tends to be concentrated, so that there is less social help
available in terms of knowledge and resources in the neighbourhood. Shortage of capital compounds this.
All this means that there are long-term structural problems
in the Australian economy, which are compounded by the inequality of
opportunity in the education sector.
Currently this effects disadvantaged people more, so can be ignored by
the more privileged classes if governments choose to ignore the long-term
implications for the society as a whole. There are some in government who think
that they are only there to get a larger slice of the pie for their own voter
segment and that they do not have an overall responsibility for the progress of
the nation. This approach must not be
allowed to dominate, as a refusal to recognise the above structural issues will
simply compound the difficultly of addressing them in the medium term.
Clearly those that are inappropriately trained or those who
try to insist on an award wage where this has been allowed to be totally
eroded, will be unable to find work and will need Newstart for a long time,
particularly if there are not enough jobs.
the changing nature of work and insecure work in
The changing nature of work as noted in b. above means that
many jobs are either displaced by technology or ‘offshored’ where wages are
cheaper. There are also an increasing
number of ‘guest workers’ on 457 Visa who are supposedly skilled and now there
are provisions for unskilled workers
under Designated Area Migration Agreements (DAMAs). These people are
supplemented by the large overseas student body who often also need work, but
are legally restricted in how much or how long they can work, making them ripe
for cash jobs, sub-award wages and exploitation. With foreign workers at least 10% of the
workforce, and union membership plummeting, there is very little enforcement of
pay and conditions. It also seems that
governments want to turn a blind eye to the situation. Employers in the
Northern Territory readily concede that DMA mainly are in the hospitality and
tourist industries, which could presumably be done by native Australians. If
native Australians are only to get ‘better jobs’ then the government which is
allowing all these jobs to be taken by temporary workers ought either organise
such jobs or stop blaming those in Australia who do not have jobs. It may be that if fruit pickers were paid
award wages the Australian fruit could not compete in the world market, but
with a consumer premium on Australian product and possible action to reinforce
this might make this viable. If not, it should be owned as a problem for all
Australians, not merely the underpaid workers.
As far as the 457 visa are concerned, many of the trades
coming to Australia, such as tiling, gyprocking, cement rendering, plumbing and
cooking could be done by Australians, but the educational emphasis on
universities and training in the medical, legal and financial areas and the
deliberate neglect of TAFE, technical skills and apprenticeships has meant that
Australia has a huge oversupply of wannabe CEOs and a severe shortage of
tradesmen. What training our youth have
is not actually appropriate for our long term needs. The two concepts of making
education a for-profit exercise and letting ‘the market’ decide as if it has
intrinsic wisdom, has made many young people do inappropriate training, before
‘the market’ teaches than the error of their plans. Governments may not be able to predict exact
numbers of each occupation needed in the next 20 years, but they should at
least make an effort. The absurd
mismatch of skills needed and current training practices begs serious
Employers, facing competition from imports with lower wages
structures have lessened their cost by making work casual and only paying for
workers when they are needed. From an employee’s point of view the
casualisation of work means that they do not have stable income, which has both immediate
effects and also longer term ones in that they cannot get home loans or even
rental properties on that they cannot show that they will be able to meet
financial commitments reliably. This further marginalises many workers and adds
to social inequality.
the appropriateness of current arrangements for
supporting those experiencing insecure employment, inconsistent employment and
precarious hours in the workforce
The Author does not fully
understand the overall situation with regard to current arrangements but can
make some observations and recount anecdotes that relate to experiences as a professional
coming into contact with support systems.
The author currently works as a doctor treating Workers Compensation and
Motor Vehicle accident injuries, so observes the action of insurers who act as
private support for these people and also Centrelink in terms of people getting
Newstart or the Disability Support Pension.
It might be noted that the NSW
government has made legislative changes to reduce the time that workers
compensation and third party insurance are paid and to give insurers more
discretion to deny payments to injury victims. This was in order to be able to
lessen premiums and be able to claim that the State was ‘business
friendly’. The premiums have fallen and
the private insurers have had a windfall, but this has been at the cost of
payment to injured workers, both in terms of treatment denied and in terms of
income benefits obtained. The author
wrote a detailed submission to the Hayne Royal Commission re this.
The effect of this State
legislation has been to force people who were on compensation to seek either Newstart
of the Disability Support Pension from Centrelink. It might be noted that the Workers
Compensation legislation of 2012 gave long-term compensation patients another 5
years of support, but this came to an end in December 2017. Most of these patients had been on
compensation for more than 5 years, despite the funded rehabilitation and job training
programmes. It might be stated that these
programmes gave them a better chance of finding a job than others in the same
physical condition who had not been injured at work. Nevertheless Centrelink has resisted putting
many of these people on the Disability Support Pension and insists on Newstart
for many people. A discontinued survey
by SIRA (State Insurance Regulatory Agency of NSW) found that of those who had
had their NSW Workers Compensation benefits discontinued in December 2017, only
29-30% were on some sort of benefit. 8% had
been declined by Centrelink, 12% were still being assessed by Centrelink, 18%
had too many assets to get a benefit (and this leaves 32% not even mentioned). Prime Minister Morrison boasted that fewer
people were being put on Disability Support Pensions, but this actually started
under the Gillard Government. The author has a patient, a migrant illiterate in
English, and probably his own language who was 61 years old, had been on
Workers Compensation for 13 years for a back injury, had Parkinson’s disease
and was a carer for his sick wife and was refused a DSP. His chance of getting
a job was negligible. When the doctor
took some time to write a detailed report to help the man, Centrelink stated
that they would not pay more than $150 for the report, which took a couple of
hours to do as his medical history was very complicated. He was forced onto Newstart and given a provider
and lot of literature on ‘mutual obligations’ that he was not even able to
read. Attempts to call Centrelink result
in waiting times on the phone of up two hours. A computer eventually answers
the call and cuts the caller off if they cannot give the number and its suffix
(which it may not have) in a very short time.
If complaints on the website are not filled in in a certain time, the
site simply switches off, losing the draft complaint. The systemic arrogance and indifference shown
by Centrelink to its clients has to be experienced to be believed.
The Staff of Centrelink cannot be
blamed in that they follow protocols set and the computerised, inadequate phone
system is entirely under the control of top management.
The author recommends that all the Committee assessing this
issue try to contact Centrelink by phone, attend an office and personally
interview a few people in the situation.
the current approach to setting income support
payments in Australia
It would appear that the level of benefits is set
historically and rises only when political pressure is applied to the
system. There does not appear to be any logical
formula setting the level of benefits in relation to costs, inflation, rents or
the poverty line. If this is indeed so,
it is no basis to run the welfare system of a country with systemic
unemployment and the need for some degree of equity to maintain social harmony.
If Australia has boom times it is fair that the success be shared, if there are
bad times, it is fair that the pain also be shared and the effects of downturns
not borne disproportionally by the most disadvantaged.
the impact of the current
approach to setting income support payments on older unemployed workers,
families, single parents, people with disability, jobseekers, students, First
Nations peoples, people from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds,
people living in regional and remote areas, and any others affected by the
The author does not have
quantitative data on the impact of different groups, but has anecdotal evidence
of patients utterly depressed about how they were treated by Centrelink, in
despair about their ability to pay their bills and expressing a lack of hope
for the future and suicidal ideation.
Older workers feel that they have no hope of ever getting a job. Young unemployed complain that they cannot
have a life as they have no money to get to job interviews, cannot join their
friends for a drink or undertake any social activity such as a coffee or a
movie. This is very destructive of their self-esteem.
the impact of geography, age and
other characteristics on the number of people receiving payments, long term
unemployment and poverty;
The author works in suburban Sydney where the effects are
very significant as stated above.
Unemployed people have difficultly even getting to a doctor in suburban
Sydney due to lack of funds and are frequently changing address as they have to
couch-surf as they cannot afford rents.
the adequacy of income support payments in Australia
and whether they allow people to maintain an acceptable standard of living in
line with community expectations and fulfil job search activities (where
relevant) and secure employment and training
The oncome support level is quite
inadequate for any sort of quality of life, and there is insufficient money
even to carry out job search activities.
Young people need computers, printers and stationery to write and send
resumes to meet their ‘mutual obligation’ targets, and it is even difficult to
get haircuts, reasonable clothes and transport to the interviews, if any. The
costs of mobile phones are also a significant expense. If they do not have unlimited time on their
mobile phone contracts they are likely to run out of credit before Centrelink
even answers the phone. If they do not have unlimited time they cannot afford
to call Centrelink.
the economic cost of long-term
unemployment, underemployment, poverty, inequality and inadequate income
It is difficult to quantify the
long-term costs of unemployment. The loss of self-esteem and the behavioural
changes that this may create may be very destructive but are also an
opportunity cost; what may have been is lost.
The loss of experience means defects in a CV and those who have a
current job are usually preferred over those who do not, creating a spiral of
long-term unemployment as the longer the unemployment, the more likely it is to
be prolonged. Eventually the long term unemployed form a subculture of
demoralised and invisible people. It is
somewhat surprising that there has not been more street crime with muggings
such as happens in the US, when the unemployed lose all faith that society will
look after them, see the average person’s indifference and therefore target
random employed people. What society decrees as ‘survival of the fittest ‘in
the normal economic and social framework may become a far more basic ‘survival
of the fittest’ in a back alley, as happens in the USA.
economic benefits – including job creation, locally and nationally – of
increasing and improving income support payments and supports, and decreasing
poverty and inequality
It is likely that the fiscal
stimulus of an increase in Newstart payments and the DSP are likely to be very beneficial.
It must be noted that the governor of the Reserve Bank, Philip Lowe has called
on the Federal government to provide fiscal stimulus
as the tax cuts and low interest rates have not been enough to increase
consumer spending, which is the major engine of economic growth. It is known that poor people spend a much
greater percentage of their income, in that they are not able to save. Hence money given as an increase in Newstart
or the DSP is likely to have a better economic multiplier to the economy than
either tax cuts or infrastructure spending as the tax cuts tends to go
proportionally to higher income who have an increased propensity to save, and
infrastructure spending also has corporate profits retained. The RBA has noted that long term increases in
income lead to a greater propensity to spend than one-off payments,
an unsurprising conclusion. It has been
stated that poorer people spend close to 100% of extra income, and this is
certainly likely to Newstart recipients, whereas wealthier people may save up
to 30%, having a far lesser multiplier effect in stimulating the economy.
The social effect of raising the
income of welfare recipients are likely to be a reversal of the problems
detailed above in proportion to the magnitude of the increase. It will reduce inequality, give some hope to
those on welfare and as such it is very important to the social cohesion in
the relationship between income support payment
levels, minimum wages and wage stagnation in Australia and other comparable
The level of income support needs
to approach wage levels to achieve the ability of welfare recipients to have a
reasonable life. Some people assume that
if the unemployment benefit level approaches that of a low wage that unemployed
people will not strive to get work. This
assumes that work is only an economic activity.
It is far more than this; it is a route to social acceptance and feeling
of participation. Those who take this highly economic view of work are usually
very dry economically and have not spoken to those who are unemployed. They would benefit from doing so. There is only danger if the loss of transport
and health concessions by virtue of being unemployed are lost as soon as work
is started and then have a long lead time to be reinstated. One of the more callous ‘reforms’ of the
Morrison government was to only pay benefits when they were granted, rather
than backdated to when the application was first made. This has doubtlessly saved the government
money, but people do not apply for benefit until they can demonstrate a need
for them and they are able to demonstrate such need at the time that they
apply. Clearly they have difficulty
surviving while their claim is processed and there should not be an incentive for
Centrelink to delay processing applications, which is currently the
It is unlikely that the level of
welfare affects the level of wages. What is more important is that those who
only have welfare are able to have a decent life. There are too many policy makers who mix up
their private moral prejudices with evidence-based policy. This leads to assumptions
that those without jobs do not want them and they must be punished for not
having a job. A more cynical view is
that blaming the victims encourages people not to look at the inadequacy of the
elite who unable to govern for the whole of society, unable to provide enough
jobs for those who need them and even unable to have an honest examination of
the problems in society that cause these problems. As one humane person commented, ‘There is not
a shortage of jobs. Anyone could give
you a laundry list of things that need to be done. There is lack of a structure that will pay
the people who do not have jobs to do things that need to be done’. A job as currently defined is a task that
either makes a profit for the employer or the government is willing to subsidise
with taxpayers funds. With government
shrinking, and international and technological competition restricting
industry, and government following an ideology that it must become smaller,
most industries are shedding labour, even when it would be better to have it,
for both the workers and the society.
interactions with other payments and services, including the loss of any
increased payments through higher rents and costs
The cost of providing people with
a basic income should not be surrounded by a paranoia that other costs may
rise. It is certainly possible that a
rent subsidy as an isolated measure may raise rents if it increases the resources
of the renters without changing the quantity of rental stock. Presumably the only thing that would keep
rents down is vacancy and people unable to pay the asking rent. So if the
amount people can pay rises these properties will rise in rent. But the problem
is not the rent subsidy; it is the lack of provision of affordable housing.
the cost and fiscal sustainability of any changes
The cost of increasing Newstart
can be calculated. The fact that this is of comparable magnitude and is almost discussed
as an option illustrates how little care the government has for the welfare of
people that they are unable to provide jobs for. The price is the price of having a fair
society. If this requires a bit more tax
this should be raised. The permanent
cutting of taxes when there is a temporary boom in commodity prices is
extremely irresponsible policy, and it may have to be reversed. The achievement
of a surplus at the expanse of giving poorer people the means to live says a
lot about the priorities of government, the commodification of people, and how
out of touch our leaders are with quite a large segment of society. If they wish to take a moral stand, one might
remind them that a society should be judged by how it treats its weakest
members. Pious people should remember the story of the Good Samaritan and the
questions asked, ‘Who was this man’s neighbour?’
the relative merits of alternative investments in health, education,
housing and other programs to improve outcomes;
One of the key needs is affordable
housing. Without housing it is very difficult to organise a life. Currently
unemployed people in Sydney have great difficulty finding accommodation and
rely on friends or relatives, sharing rooms, couch surfing and moving relatively
frequently. Money put into affordable
housing would be money well spent, and is frankly a disgrace that housing has
become an asset class for investors who build for the aspiring middle class rather
than affordable housing and the government seems content merely to watch as
inappropriate housing is built for much of the need. Indeed government housing
is now largely confined to more and more disadvantaged groups, creating ghettos
of social problems. The provision of
affordable social housing should be a major priority as shelter is a major
The provision of access to health
is also a human right. The word ‘health’
has been appropriated and now in common political parlance refers to ‘access to
insurance to pay for treatment of sickness.’
Health is actually the absence of sickness and it is far cheaper and
better to maintain it than to merely pay for treatment of those already sick.
Access to good food and housing are far more cost-effective than medical
programmes, particularly private health insurance, which has an increasingly
elective nature in terms of what is done, and the degree of luxury in which it
is done. A retiring US Surgeon-General
was asked ‘what was the greatest medical advance in your time?’ and to the
surprise of the questioner replied, ‘The introduction of Food Stamps’. He recognised the importance of nutrition in
the maintenance of health. In the US, with its niggardly attitude to welfare
there are increasing problems with nutrition for poor people and controversy
over the payment for this such that there is a discussion of the need for
better nutrition. Australia with its poor levels of Newstart
and its controversy over the cashless welfare card probably has a similar
problem which is as yet not recognised.
It might be noted that there was free milk at schools in former times in
Australia, and more recently there is a ‘National School Lunch Program’ in the
US for children in lower socioeconomic areas
as they recognised that students were undernourished and this was affecting
their education. In terms of
alternatives to raising Newstart, Australia may want to consider such
programmes as it may increase equality of opportunity and school attendance in
disadvantaged communities. New Zealand
makes use a school nurses with a wide range of functions.
This may a better way of delivering welfare to areas of disadvantage,
especially if parents are dysfunctional.
In terms of preventive health, as
opposed to treatment programmes such as school-based dental care, vaccination,
or learn to swim classes may help improve health and save lives in disadvantaged
communities and improve equality of opportunity.
In terms of the cost-effectiveness
of education spending, two features stand out. The first is that Australia is
falling down the league tables of world school education at a serious rate and
a serious level. The second is that the Gonski I Model of
education funding has not occurred and there continues to be very high levels
of subsidy to the private sector, with corresponding neglect of public school
education. Education is like health in that it is more
important that those at the bottom get a reasonable basic standard than that
those at the top get everything that can be offered. Yet the political imperatives work the other
way. ‘Choice’ in education has a very
detrimental effect in that subsidies, such as free travel and private school
subsidies allow more privileged children to move to be with similar privileged
children. There is then residualisation of the ‘others’. All those with disadvantage are congregated
together with lesser resources and a lack of role models. Clearly the poor results achieved in this
situation drag Australia’s average down, as well as condemning children from
disadvantaged areas to perpetuate their parents’ disadvantaged situation.
Funding equality of opportunity would give these children a better start in
terms of education, hopes, and employment, and as such would be an investment
in reducing longer term unemployment.
It might be noted that universal
health insurance is also very important.
Medicare is being undermined in that the Medicare rebate to doctors,
which was set at 85% of the AMA fee in order to get doctor support for the concept,
has been totally undermined. The government has not raised the rebate with
inflation for over 30 years, so that the real value of the Medicare rebate has
declined form 85% of the AMA rate to 46%. This is an almost 50% cut from a
doctor’s point of view and is a demonstration of very bad faith by successive governments.
Treatment of Medicare patients has thus returned to the status of ‘charity’ in the
minds of many doctors. Almost all
specialists and many GPs will not take Medicare without a co-payment, so the
‘bulk-billing’ rates as trumpeted by the government are based on the GP habits,
where shorter and more consultations have been used to make up the income
deficit. These bulk-billing figures also neglect to mention the fact that a co-payment
exists for many services in addition to the Medicare bulk-bill. Many patients go to the Emergency Departments
(EDs), rather than a GP because these are free. This tends to be discouraged by
the EDs so patient present later and sicker. ED visits are far more expensive
than GPs, so it is false economy to save money on GPs and to push patients to
EDs. It is also a cost transfer from Federal to State payments system and the
overall cost to Government is greater.
other countries’ approaches to setting income
support payments, minimum wages and awards
The level of payments depends to a
considerable extent on the supply of shared or public resources. If there was
universal access to affordable housing, free education, free health care and
cheap public transport, income support needed would be less. Similarly if there
is poor public transport, car dependency, privatised toll roads, education and health
with many co-payments for doctors’ visits, school excursions and sports, more
money is needed in welfare payments if there is to be any hope of equality of
opportunity for children and a reasonable life for welfare-dependent
adults. Yet usually these aspects of
social policy are seen in isolation.
Though the private sector is assumed to be highly efficient, the
countries with the highest standard of living such as Denmark and Sweden often
have very large public sectors. The point is that natural monopolies can
deliver goods more cheaply than private organisations as they do not have to
factor profits into their operations, so if both private and public systems
were run with the same efficiency, the public one would be cheaper because of
the lack of need to generate a profit. The
need for public good also needs to be calculated. A public transport system that loses money
might have huge benefits that could be costed, such as the savings o roads and
parking, better air quality and making central city jobs available to people from
the outer suburbs. Parents in inner city locations are familiar with problems
such as difficultly staffing their child care centres as the lowly-paid staff
cannot afford transport costs from the outer suburbs and either seek jobs
closer to home, or do not work. Making
each element in society pay its own way without looking at an overall picture
of spending and benefits amounts to having policy options confined by a very
simplistic accounting system.
other bodies that set payments, minimum wages and
awards in Australia
The setting of award wages in Australia has been
traditionally done in the Courts which has in theory prevented political
interference, but the destruction of unions by both changes in the
concentration of workers and by deliberate political action has allowed the
forces of both a global market and a large un-unionised and unsupervised pool
of temporary visa workers and students needing income has allowed the eroding
of wages, particularly in the lower socioeconomic groups. This has allowed the growth of an increasing
‘cash economy’. This has created a
US-style ‘working poor and underemployment, who may not be actually unemployed,
but have the same problems as if they were, at times exacerbated by the lack of
benefits such as a Health Care card or transport concessions that may be
available to those officially on welfare.
In the mid-1980s the Australian Bureau of Statistics defined
‘unemployment’ as having less than 25 hours per week of work. The US definition was that anyone with regular
work, even an hour a week was ‘employed’.
Commentators such as Maximilian Walsh even compared the US rate to Australia’s,
concluding that Australia was doing very poorly! Political pressure soon made Australia adopt
the ‘international definition’ and our unemployment rate plummeted. The calculation
of index had been consistent, but the number has been relatively meaningless
the role of independent and expert decision–making
in setting payments
The principle that wage setting must be kept separate from
government should be extended to unemployment relief. The politicisation of welfare, the moral
judgements that go with it and the relative political powerlessness of those on
welfare means that a neutral and evidence-based approach to welfare needs to be
established. This may appear a radical
proposition given the relatively large cost of welfare. But the danger of
political interference has been recognised in having the Reserve Bank as an
independent entity, and this principle is endorsed by all leading
economies. The Boilermaker’s principle
in law upheld the need for an independent wage arbiter. There are also pricing
tribunals that set electricity prices.
While it is true that a higher welfare layout may cause government
inconvenience in that they will have to budget for this, the current practice
to grant tax cuts which are electorally popular, favour wealthy people and are
granted when the economy is enjoying high commodity prices for exports also
makes for budget pressures later. It is an irony that governments concerned
about the effect of welfare expenditures are the same ones that grant tax cuts,
and are keen on privatisation deliberately undermining long term government
revenue. An independently-determined,
reasonable level of welfare would create a cost obligation that would have to
be managed by future governments, but this might make them less cavalier about
giving away their revenue sources and make them recognise that they must manage
the country for all Australians, not merely the demographic that voted for